Drew De Marco, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co.
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 24, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres JJ
570853/13.
Drew De Marco, P.C., a/a/o Loretta Golson, Plaintiff-Respondent,
against
Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered March 15, 2011, which, upon preclusion of defendant's expert testimony, directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff.
Per Curiam.
Order (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered March 15, 2011, reversed, with $10 costs, and matter remanded for a new trial.
Plaintiff sues to recover first-party no-fault benefits for chiropractic services rendered to the insured assignor in the form of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). At the commencement of trial, the parties stipulated in open court to "the credentials [and] the expertise" of defendant's chiropractor, Dr. Kevin Portnoy, D.C. However, during Dr. Portnoy's redirect testimony, the trial court precluded the witness from testifying as an expert on MUA procedures based on his acknowledgment that he was not certified to perform MUA. The Court thereupon directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff.
On defendant's appeal, we reverse and order a new trial. Based upon the parties' open court stipulation, Dr. Portnoy was qualified as a chiropractic expert. Thus, he need not have been certified as an MUA specialist to offer an opinion as to the medical necessity of the MUA procedures here at issue (see Matter of Solano v City of Mount Vernon, 108 AD3d 676, 677 [2013]). His lack of certification in this area goes to the weight to be accorded his testimony, not its admissibility (see Borawski v Huang, 34 AD3d 409, 410 [2006]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 24, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.