Borisovski v City of New York
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 19, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres, JJ
13-228.
Alexandre Borisovski, Plaintiff-Appellant, - - The
against
City of New York, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered on or about February 27, 2012, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered on or about February 27, 2012, affirmed, without costs.
On a nonjury trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed unless the court's conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). Applying that standard of review here, we sustain the dismissal of plaintiff's false imprisonment and related claims. The trial court, as factfinder, was warranted in rejecting plaintiff's version of the events underlying his claims and crediting the testimony of the responding police officer, which established that police lawfully ejected plaintiff from the premises based on his "belligerent" conduct and that plaintiff was neither confined nor offensively touched (see Gray v Macy's E., Inc., 25 AD3d 475 [2006]). Plaintiff's remaining points, including his assignment of error regarding the conduct of the trial, are lacking in merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 19, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.