95 Third LLC v Moroney
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 30, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Hunter, Jr., JJ
570509/13.
95Third LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,
against
Laura Moroney, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant,
Tenant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Timmie E. Elsner, J.), dated December 27, 2012, as denied her motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement in a holdover summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Appeal from order (Timmie E. Elsner, J.), dated December 27, 2012, dismissed, without costs, as moot.
Tenant's appeal, which concerns the propriety of an order denying vacatur of the parties' settlement stipulation and the resultant consent final judgment, has been rendered moot since tenant vacated the apartment premises and the warrant of eviction was executed during the appeal's pendency (see Makus v Russo, 237 AD2d 762, 762-763 [1997]). As no exception to the mootness doctrine is present (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]), the appeal must be dismissed. In any event, were we not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: October 30, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.