Ogunloye v Williams
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Shulman, Schoenfeld, JJ
571071/12.
Samson Ogunloye, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Vivian Williams, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered May 9, 2012, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered May 9, 2012, affirmed, without costs.
Applying the narrow standard of review governing appeals in small claims actions (see CCA 1807), and giving due deference to the trial court's factual findings and its negative assessment of the plaintiff's credibility (see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]), we find no basis to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court in dismissing the action. Plaintiff failed to establish that he was entitled to a refund of the retainer fee previously paid to the defendant-attorney for properly-earned services.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 27, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.