Lin v 19 Eldridge St. Realty Corp.
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 20, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Shulman, Torres, JJ
571037/12.
Erick C. Lin, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
19 Eldridge Street Realty Corp., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered July 12, 2012, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered July 12, 2012, affirmed, without costs.
Dismissal of this small claims action achieved "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (CCA 1804, 1807) see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). In the absence of privity (see Tamco Enters. v Mitsubishi Elec. Am., 190 AD2d 623 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 659 [1993]), no legal basis was shown to impose liability upon the defendant building owner for any lost income or other damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff, at most a remote subtenant, following the closure of the premises as a result of illegal activity not attributable to defendant.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 20, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.