167 LLC v Calinescu
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 20, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Shulman, Torres, JJ
570683/11.
167 LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,
against
Nicolae Calinescu, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant, as limited by his briefs, appeals from those portions of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated August 5, 2011, which granted landlord's motion to strike the jury demand and certain counterclaims interposed by tenant in a holdover summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Appeal from order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated August 5, 2011, dismissed, without costs.
Pending the present appeal, the holdover proceeding was resolved on the merits by the grant of landlord's motion for summary judgment, with a final judgment entered in landlord's favor. In this posture, tenant's appeal from the interlocutory order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the final judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241 [1976]). The issues raised by tenant are reviewable upon appeal from the final judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: March 20, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.