Pianello v New York City Hous. Auth. (TAFT Houses)
Annotate this CaseDecided on January 16, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ
12-456.
Carol Pianello, Petitioner-Tenant-Appellant,
against
New York City Housing Authority (TAFT Houses), Respondent-Landlord-Respondent.
Petitioner-tenant appeals from an order of the Civil
Court of the City of New York, New York County (Ruben A. Martino, J.), dated March 23, 2012, which, after a hearing, denied her petition for restoration to the apartment premises.
Per Curiam.
Order (Ruben A. Martino, J.), dated March 23, 2012, affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated by Ruben A. Martino, J. at Civil Court.
The hearing court properly denied the petitioning tenant's application for restoration to the subject public housing apartment, based on its fully supported finding that tenant abandoned the apartment prior to the alleged illegal lockout. Notably, the record shows that prior to the landlord's actions complained of herein tenant had moved to Virginia to live with relatives, no rent had been paid for several months, and one of tenant's family members had returned the apartment key to respondent-landlord.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: January 16, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.