People v Rangel (Dayse)
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 7, 2011
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ
570392/09.
Respondent, - -
against
Dayse Rangel, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michael Yavinsky, J.), rendered April 1, 2009, convicting her, upon a plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Michael Yavinsky, J.), rendered April 1, 2009, affirmed.
Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833, 834 [1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: March 07, 2011
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.