Marom v Graubard
Annotate this CaseDecided on January 14, 2011
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres, JJ
570647/07.
Michael Marom, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
David Graubard, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of
New York, New York County (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2010, which
denied his motion to renew and reargue his prior motion to have the underlying money judgment
entered against him deemed satisfied.
Per Curiam.
Order (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2010, insofar as appealable, affirmed, without costs.
Since plaintiff offered no new facts that were unavailable at the time of the original motion, that branch of his motion seeking renewal was properly denied (see CPLR 2221[e][2]). To the extent plaintiff challenges the denial of that branch of his motion seeking reargument, no appeal lies from such denial (see D'Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [2010]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: January 14, 2011
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.