Jones St. Bldg. Assoc. v Moskowitz
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 10, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ
570415/10.
Jones Street Building Associates, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,
against
Roselee Moskowitz, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
(Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated May 10, 2010, which granted her motion to be restored to
possession of the premises in a nonpayment summary proceeding but conditioned restoration
upon the payment of $8,348.95 by May 14, 2010.
Per Curiam.
Order (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated May 10, 2010, affirmed, without costs.
Tenant failed to comply with the payment schedule set forth in the so-ordered stipulation of settlement resolving this nonpayment summary proceeding and failed to comply with payment deadline extensions provided in subsequent court orders (one specifically denominated as "final"), resulting in tenant's eviction from the subject apartment premises. In this posture, and considering the considerable rental arrears which had amassed and tenant's inability to obtain funds from charitable organizations to satisfy the arrears, Civil Court providently exercised its discretion in denying tenant's motion for restoration relief.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur
NOVEMBER 10, 2010
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
September 2010 Term
Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ.
Jones Street Building Associates, NY County Clerk's No.
Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,570415/10
-
against-
Roselee Moskowitz,Calendar No. 10-270
Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York
County (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated May 10, 2010, which granted her motion to be restored
to possession of the premises in a nonpayment summary proceeding but conditioned restoration
upon the payment of $8,348.95 by May 14, 2010.
Per Curiam.
Order (Bruce E. Scheckowitz, J.), dated May 10, 2010, affirmed, without costs.
Tenant failed to comply with the payment schedule set forth in the so-ordered stipulation
of settlement resolving this nonpayment summary proceeding and failed to comply with payment
deadline extensions provided in subsequent court orders (one specifically denominated as
"final"), resulting in tenant's eviction from the subject apartment premises. In this posture, and
considering the considerable rental arrears which had amassed and tenant's inability to obtain
funds from charitable organizations to satisfy the arrears, Civil Court providently exercised its
discretion in denying tenant's motion for restoration relief.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: November 10, 2010
Decision Date: November 10, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.