Wells v Flowers
Annotate this CaseDecided on May 25, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ
570211/10.
Theodore Wells,-Appellant,
against
Charlie Flowers, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of
New York, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on or about September 8, 2009, after
trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on or about September 8, 2009, affirmed, without costs.
Applying the narrow standard of review governing appeals in small claims actions
(see CCA 1807), and giving due deference to the trial court's findings, which rest in
large measure on credibility determinations (see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126
[2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]), we find no basis on this record to disturb the
trial court's determination that plaintiff failed to establish an actionable conversion.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: May 25, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.