Elliana 76 LLC v Spier
Annotate this CaseDecided on May 24, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ
570049/10.
Elliana 76 LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-
against
Margaret Spier, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.
Petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from those portions of an order of the Civil Court
of the City of New York, New York County (Peter M. Wendt, J.), which granted respondent's
motion for summary judgment dismissing the holdover proceeding and set the matter down for a
hearing regarding tenant's entitlement to attorneys' fees.
Per Curiam.
Order (Peter M. Wendt, J.), dated December 10, 2009, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated by Peter M. Wendt, J. at Civil Court.
We note that petitioner's present argument that a triable issue exists regarding whether respondent should be equitably estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense is not properly before us, since petitioner did not raise that specific claim before Civil Court. In any event, were we to consider it, we would find it unavailing (see generally Ross v Louise Wise Services, Inc., 8 NY3d 478 [2007]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: May 24, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.