Wood v Schulder
Annotate this CaseDecided on May 14, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Hunter, JJ
570688/09.
Travis Wood, Plaintiff-Respondent,
against
Robin Schulder, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City
of New York, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered on or about September 17, 2009,
after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding him damages in the principal sum of $2,300.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered on or about September 17, 2009, affirmed, without costs.
A judgment rendered in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court will be sustained on appeal unless it is shown that "substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; see Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). Applying that limited review standard here, and giving due deference to the trial court's assessment of the testimony offered by defendant and her witness as "incredible," we find no basis to disturb the judgment in plaintiff's favor.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: May 14, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.