Gonzalez v Zinner
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 6, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, JJ
570261/07.
Maria Gonzalez and Alvaro Gonzalez and other Tenants of 235 West 146th Street, Petitioners-Tenants-Respondents,
against
Ihay Zinner and LKH Assets, LLC, Respondents-Landlords, Washington Mutual Bank, Respondent, -and- Department of Housing Preservation, and Development, Respondent-Respondent, -and- Esquire Group Estates, LLC, Chase Group Alliance, LLC and Vintage Ventures, LLC, Intervenors-Appellants.
Intervenors Esquire Group Estates, LLC, Chase Group Alliance, LLC and Vintage Ventures,
LLC appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
(Pam B. Jackman Brown, J.), entered on or about February 9, 2007, after a nonjury trial, which
conditionally directed the appointment of an administrator pursuant to RPAPL article 7-A.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Pam B. Jackman Brown, J.), entered on or about February 9, 2007,
affirmed, with $25 costs.
The points improperly raised by the intervenors for the first time on appeal, including their apparent constitutional challenge to RPAPL article 7-A, are unpreserved (see Dailey v City of New York, 301 AD2d 439 [2003]) and we decline to review them. We note our recent affirmance of an order denying the intervenors' post-judgment motion to remove the RPAPL article 7-A administrator (Gonzales v Zinner, 25 Misc 3d 139[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52388[U] [*2][2009]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: April 06, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.