Rivera v Motta's Real Estate, Corp.
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 8, 2010
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Shulman, Hunter, JJ
570824/09.
Lydia Rivera,
against
Motta's Real Estate, Corp., Jacquelin Motta, and Jose A. Del Rosario, Defendants-Appellants.
Defendants appeal from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City
of New York, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2009, after
trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding her damages in the principal sum of $3,046, and
dismissing defendants' counterclaims.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2009, affirmed, without costs.
The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of
substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" in awarding judgment in plaintiff's favor
and dismissing defendants' counterclaims (CCA 1804, 1807; see Williams v Roper, 269
AD2d 125 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). The evidence, fairly interpreted,
supports the trial court's finding that plaintiff was entitled to a refund of her security deposit
pursuant to the terms of the parties' written agreement.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur
Decision Date: March 08, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.