Lear v ADM Prods.
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 18, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Heitler, Hunter JJ
.
Richard Lear, Plaintiff-Appellant, 570642/09
against
ADM Productions, Defendant-Respondent, ADM Productions, Third-party Plaintiff-Respondent, LB Lights West, Inc., Third-party Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New
York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered March 21, 2008, as granted defendant's motion for
summary judgment dismissing his complaint.
Per Curiam.
Order (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered March 21, 2008, affirmed, with $10 costs, for the
reasons stated by Jeffrey K. Oing, J. at Civil Court. (See Thompson v Grumman Aerospace
Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557-558 [1991]; cf. Smith v Pizza Hut of Am., Inc., 289 AD2d
48 [2001]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 18, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.