Lear v ADM Prods.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Lear v ADM Prods. 2009 NY Slip Op 52574(U) [25 Misc 3d 144(A)] Decided on December 18, 2009 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 18, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Heitler, Hunter JJ
.

Richard Lear, Plaintiff-Appellant, 570642/09

against

ADM Productions, Defendant-Respondent, ADM Productions, Third-party Plaintiff-Respondent, LB Lights West, Inc., Third-party Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered March 21, 2008, as granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing his complaint.


Per Curiam.

Order (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered March 21, 2008, affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated by Jeffrey K. Oing, J. at Civil Court. (See Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557-558 [1991]; cf. Smith v Pizza Hut of Am., Inc., 289 AD2d 48 [2001]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 18, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.