People v Bell (Brian)

Annotate this Case
[*1] People v Bell (Brian) 2009 NY Slip Op 52129(U) [25 Misc 3d 131(A)] Decided on October 21, 2009 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 21, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Shulman, JJ
570314/08.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Brian Bell, Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered July 20, 2007, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered July 20, 2007, affirmed.

Since defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea, and since this case does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]), his challenge to the validity of the plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. A plea of guilty will be sustained in the absence of a full factual allocution where, as here, there is no indication that the guilty plea assented to by the defendant in the presence of counsel was improvident or baseless (see People v Winbush, 199 AD2d 447, 448 [1993]; see also People v Goldstein, 12 NY3d 295, 300-301 [2009]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: October 21, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.