Pinkney v King Pawn Brokers Inc.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Pinkney v King Pawn Brokers Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 51170(U) [23 Misc 3d 147(A)] Decided on June 10, 2009 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 10, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, J.P., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570110/09.

Kathy Pinkney, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

King Pawn Brokers Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Kathy Pinkney, Plaintiff-Appellant, Citi Pawn Brokers Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

In consolidated actions, plaintiff appeals from two judgments of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Donald A. Miles, J.), each entered on or about April 16, 2008, after trial, in favor of defendants dismissing the actions.


Per Curiam:

Judgments (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2008, affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" (CCA 1804, 1807) in rejecting the plaintiff's unsubstantiated allegations of fraud and dismissing the within small claims actions.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: June 10, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.