Pinkney v King Pawn Brokers Inc.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 10, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, J.P., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570110/09.
Kathy Pinkney, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
King Pawn Brokers Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Kathy Pinkney, Plaintiff-Appellant, Citi Pawn Brokers Inc., Defendant-Respondent.
In consolidated actions, plaintiff appeals from two judgments of the Civil Court of the City
of New York, Bronx County (Donald A. Miles, J.), each entered on or about April 16, 2008,
after trial, in favor of defendants dismissing the actions.
Per Curiam:
Judgments (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2008, affirmed, without costs.
The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" (CCA 1804, 1807) in rejecting the plaintiff's unsubstantiated allegations of fraud and dismissing the within small claims actions.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: June 10, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.