Beth Israel Med. Ctr. v Rodriguez
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 9, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570018/09.
Beth Israel Medical Center, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
James Rodriguez, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York
County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered June 26, 2008, which, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint
with prejudice.
Per Curiam.
Order (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered June 26, 2008, reversed, without costs, complaint reinstated and matter remanded for trial.
While the dismissal order is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice (CCA 1702[c]), in the interest of judicial economy we deem the notice of appeal to be a motion for leave to appeal and grant such leave (see Alveranga-Duran v Whitehall Apts., 40 AD3d 287 [2007]).
The sua sponte dismissal of plaintiff's complaint at a pre-trial conference, apparently based on a single, unsigned letter said to have been written by a representative of nonparty Oxford Insurance Company, was error. Even assuming the authenticity and admissibility of the correspondence, at this juncture, it did not conclusively establish a defense as a matter of law, warranting the drastic measure of an unsolicited dismissal prior to trial.
THIS CONSTITUTE THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur
Decision Date: April 09, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.