David Ellis Real Estate, LP v Fitch
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 26, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler JJ
570766/07.
David Ellis Real Estate, LP Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant,
against
Mark Fitch and Phoebe Fitch, Respondents-Tenants-Respondents, Gayle Dizon, Russell Fernandez, "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" Respondents-Occupants.
Landlord, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the
City of New York, New York County (Kevin C. McClanahan, J.), dated April 10, 2007, as
denied its motion for summary judgment on the holdover petition.
PER CURIAM.
Order (Kevin C. McClanahan, J.), dated April 10, 2007, affirmed, with $10 costs.
We sustain the denial of landlord's motion for
summary judgment on the holdover petition, since it failed to conclusively establish that
respondents' living arrangements — which, so far as shown, entailed shared access to
common areas and no subdivision or partitioning of the five-bedroom loft unit — created
an illegal sublet, and not a roommate situation which would trigger no eviction remedy (see
BLF Realty Corp. v Kasher, 299 AD2d 87 [2002], lv dismissed 100 NY2d 535
[2003]; Handwerker v Ensley, 261 AD2d 190 [1999]; see also Ishida v
Markowicz, 18 AD3d 502 [2005]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 26, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.