Ramirez v 72-82 Terrace Realty, Inc.

Annotate this Case
[*1] Ramirez v 72-82 Terrace Realty, Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 50434(U) [22 Misc 3d 140(A)] Decided on March 13, 2009 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 13, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570636/08.

Carmen Ramirez, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

72-82 Terrace Realty, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered March 27, 2008, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment.


Per Curiam.

Order (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered March 27, 2008, affirmed, without costs.

A corporation's failure to file a change of address with the Secretary of State does not constitute a per se barrier to vacatur of a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 317, which permits a defendant who has been "served with a summons other than by personal delivery" and "who does not appear" to defend the action "upon a finding of the court that he did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense" (see Arabesque Recordings LLC v Capacity LLC, 45 AD3d 404 [2007]). The affidavit submitted by defendant's officer established that defendant did not receive personal notice of the summons in time to defend and that it has a possible meritorious defense to plaintiff's vaguely stated negligence claim.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur
Decision Date: March 13, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.