Mautner-Glick Corp. v Soto
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 13, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570749/07.
Mautner-Glick Corp. and Estate of Fred Ziess, Petitioners-Landlords- Respondents,
against
Flora Soto, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from (1) a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New
York County (Laurie L. Lau, J.), entered July 27, 2007, after a nonjury trial, which awarded
possession to landlords in a holdover summary proceeding, and (2) an order of the same court
(Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated May 2, 2008, which, after a hearing, granted landlords' motion for
an undertaking. Landlords appeal from an order of the same court (Marc Finkelstein, J.), dated
September 27, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the holdover
petition.
Per Curiam.
Final judgment (Laurie L. Lau, J.), entered July 27, 2007, affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Laurie L. Lau, J. at the Civil Court. Appeal from order (Marc Finkelstein, J.), dated September 27, 2006, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. Appeal from order (Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated May 2, 2008, dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 13, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.