Mautner-Glick Corp. v Soto

Annotate this Case
[*1] Mautner-Glick Corp. v Soto 2009 NY Slip Op 50433(U) [22 Misc 3d 140(A)] Decided on March 13, 2009 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on March 13, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570749/07.

Mautner-Glick Corp. and Estate of Fred Ziess, Petitioners-Landlords- Respondents,

against

Flora Soto, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.

Tenant appeals from (1) a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie L. Lau, J.), entered July 27, 2007, after a nonjury trial, which awarded possession to landlords in a holdover summary proceeding, and (2) an order of the same court (Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated May 2, 2008, which, after a hearing, granted landlords' motion for an undertaking. Landlords appeal from an order of the same court (Marc Finkelstein, J.), dated September 27, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the holdover petition.


Per Curiam.

Final judgment (Laurie L. Lau, J.), entered July 27, 2007, affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Laurie L. Lau, J. at the Civil Court. Appeal from order (Marc Finkelstein, J.), dated September 27, 2006, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. Appeal from order (Jean T. Schneider, J.), dated May 2, 2008, dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 13, 2009

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.