Seungho Kim v Amankwaa
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 20, 2009
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
.
Seungho Kim, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, 570405/08
against
Kofi O. Amankwaa, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County
(Raul Cruz, J.), dated June 17, 2008, which denied his motion to vacate the default final
judgment and stay execution of the warrant of eviction and granted landlord's cross motion to
re-execute the warrant in a nonpayment summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Order (Raul Cruz, J.), dated June 17, 2008, reversed, without costs, landlord's cross motion denied, and tenant's motion granted to the extent of vacating the warrant of eviction.
Under the present circumstances, and in view of the tenant's tender of the full amount of the final judgment issued in this nonpayment summary proceeding, we exercise our discretion and vacate the warrant of eviction so as to avoid a forfeiture of the valuable commercial leasehold. Our examination of the history of the proceeding satisfies us that sufficient "good cause" has been shown to warrant the requested relief (RPAPL § 749[3]); see 102-116 Eighth Ave. Assocs. v Oyola, 299 AD2d 296 [2002]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: February 20, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.