Fergusson v Dumbacher
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 22, 2008
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Davis, J.P., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570564/06.
Claire Fergusson, Plaintiff-Appellant,
against
Joseph Dumbacher and John Dumbacher, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court
of the City of New York, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered January
29, 2007, which dismissed the action as time-barred.
Per Curiam.
Order (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered January 29, 2007, reversed, without costs, complaint reinstated and the matter remanded for de novo consideration of defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction.
The traverse court erred when it, sua sponte, dismissed the action on Statute of Limitations grounds. That defense, although pleaded in defendants' answer, was neither advanced by defendants during prior motion practice nor on their present motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court's unrequested grant of relief improperly eliminated the defendants' initial burden of establishing that the action was untimely and denied the pro se plaintiff a meaningful opportunity to contest the issue (see Mendez v Steen Trucking, Inc., 254 AD2d 715 [1998]; Zarintash v Kopple, 5 Misc 3d 130[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51309[U][2004]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: December 22, 2008
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.