Rostant v 790 RSD Acquisition LLC

Annotate this Case
[*1] Rostant v 790 RSD Acquisition LLC 2008 NY Slip Op 52308(U) [21 Misc 3d 138(A)] Decided on November 18, 2008 Appellate Term, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 18, 2008
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Davis, J.P., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570288/07.

Caroline Rostant, Petitioner-Respondent,

against

790 RSD Acquisition LLC, Respondent-Appellant.

Respondent appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie L. Lau, J.), dated May 2, 2007, after a hearing, which granted petitioner's motion to be restored to possession.


Per Curiam.

Order (Laurie L. Lau, J.), dated May 2, 2007, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Giving due deference to the hearing court's findings of fact and credibility, we find no basis to disturb the court's determination that petitioner, the stepdaughter of the now deceased rent-controlled tenant, was in constructive possession of the premises (see RPAPL 713 [10]), and that landlord's principal was aware of petitioner's possessory claim at the time of the lockout (see Banks v 508 Columbus Properties, 8 Misc 3d 135[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51189[U] [2005]. In the circumstances present, we agree that petitioner could not legally be ousted without legal process.

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
Decision Date: November 18, 2008

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.