B & B Manhattan, L.L.C. v Sack
Annotate this CaseDecided on April 9, 2008
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570319/07.
B & B Manhattan, L.L.C., Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent,
against
Petezi Sack, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County
(Laurie L. Lau, J.), dated May 8, 2007, which granted landlord's motion for attorneys' fees in a
nonpayment summary proceeding.
PER CURIAM:
Order (Laurie L. Lau, J.) dated May 8, 2007
affirmed, with $10 costs.
Landlord prevailed on the central issues litigated in the underlying nonpayment summary
proceeding and is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees pursuant to the parties' lease agreement
(see Nestor v McDowell, 81 NY2d 410, 415-416 [1993]; Duell v Roberts, 232
AD2d 301 [1996]). The discretionary stay of enforcement of the possessory
judgment does not alter landlord's status as the prevailing party (see 326-330 East 35th
St. Assoc. v Sofizade, 2003 NY Slip Op 50962[U] [2003]). Tenant's remaining arguments, to
the extent preserved for appellate review, are lacking in merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: April 09, 2008
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.