Matter of Cruz v Division of Parole, New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision

Annotate this Case
Matter of Cruz v Division of Parole, New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision 2020 NY Slip Op 04360 Decided on July 30, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 30, 2020
530483

[*1]In the Matter of Larry Cruz, Appellant,

v

Division of Parole, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: June 26, 2020
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Devine and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

Larry Cruz, Woodbourne, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Schick, J.), entered October 18, 2019 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition challenging the denial by the Board of Parole of his fifth request for parole release. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, during the pendency of this appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board and was denied parole. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and, as the narrow exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable, it must be dismissed (see Matter of Adger v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 181 AD3d 1120, 1120-1121 [2020]; Matter of Muggleberg v New York State Bd. of Parole, 167 AD3d 1181, 1181 [2018]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Mulvey, Devine and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.