Matter of Richardson v Keyser

Annotate this Case
Matter of Richardson v Keyser 2019 NY Slip Op 08910 Decided on December 12, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 12, 2019
529514

[*1]In the Matter of Fred Richardson, Petitioner,

v

William Keyser, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Calendar Date: November 8, 2019
Before: Lynch, J.P., Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

Fred Richardson, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Lynch, J.P., Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

AJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.