People v Clark

Annotate this Case
People v Clark 2019 NY Slip Op 08741 Decided on December 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 5, 2019
110733

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Allison Clark, Appellant.

Calendar Date: November 8, 2019
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward, for respondent.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward, for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered September 7, 2018, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived her right to appeal. Consistent with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to a prison term of three years to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision and imposed restitution. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.