People v Mayhew

Annotate this Case
People v Mayhew 2019 NY Slip Op 07446 Decided on October 17, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 17, 2019
109535

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Willie O. Mayhew, Appellant.

Calendar Date: October 4, 2019
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Weeden A. Wetmore, District Attorney, Elmira (Susan Rider-Ulacco of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered September 19, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in satisfaction of a four-count indictment, apparently while his suppression motion was pending. He was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of six years to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defendant's pro se brief and counsel's brief, we disagree. To that end, we perceive several issues of arguable merit, including whether defendant forfeited his suppression motion, whether he was properly sentenced as a second felony offender and whether the sentence is harsh and excessive. Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of these or any other issues, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address these issues and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490, 492-493 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 639 [2001]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.