Matter of Malinowski v New York State Div. of Human Rights

Annotate this Case
Matter of Malinowski v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2018 NY Slip Op 00209 Decided on January 11, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: January 11, 2018
524855

[*1]In the Matter of KEITH A. MALINOWSKI, Appellant,

v

NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.)



In the Matter of MICHAEL POWERS, as President of the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc., Appellant,

v

NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Calendar Date: November 14, 2017
Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, LLP, Albany (Lawrence H. Schaefer of counsel), for appellants.

Caroline J. Downey, New York State Division of Human Rights, New York City (Michael K. Swirsky of counsel), for New York State Division of Human Rights, respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and another, respondents.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hartman, J.), entered June 22, 2016 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners' applications, in two proceedings pursuant to Executive Law § 298, to review determinations of respondent State Division of Human Rights that respondent Department of Corrections and Community Supervision was not guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on gender.

Judgment affirmed, upon the opinion of Justice Denise A. Hartman.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.