Johnson v State of New York

Annotate this Case
Johnson v State of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 04334 Decided on June 1, 2017 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 1, 2017
523157

[*1]JOHNATHAN JOHNSON, Appellant,

v

STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Calendar Date: May 2, 2017
Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

Johnathan Johnson, Malone, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.




Garry, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (DeBow, J.), entered March 21, 2016, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the claim.

Claimant, an inmate at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed a claim alleging that, on occasion, prison officials refused to pick up and deliver his law library requests, refused to deliver requested legal supplies and legal mail, and refused to notify maintenance that his cell sink needed to be fixed. In addition to submitting an answer that set forth numerous affirmative defenses, defendant moved to dismiss the claim. After claimant failed to submit any opposition to defendant's motion, the Court of Claims granted the motion. Defendant appeals.

Having failed to respond in any manner to the motion to dismiss, claimant is precluded from appealing the order (see CPLR 5511). Claimant's "sole remedy is rather to move to vacate the default order and, if necessary, to appeal from the denial of that motion" (Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1558, 1558 [2016]; see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1560, 1560 [2016]; Matter of Susan UU. v Scott VV., 119 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2014]). As the record does not reflect that claimant availed himself of that procedure, the appeal is not properly before us.

Peters, P.J., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.