Matter of Dib

Annotate this Case
Matter of Dib 2017 NY Slip Op 01755 Decided on March 9, 2017 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: March 9, 2017

[*1]In the Matter of ALBERT HAMILTON DIB, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 3018082)

Calendar Date: February 27, 2017
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.

Albert Hamilton Dib, Hackensack, New Jersey, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Albert Hamilton Dib was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000 and lists a business address in Hackensack, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration (hereinafter OCA). By notice of motion and affirmation dated June 16, 2016, Dib now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a])[FN1]. By correspondence from its Chief Attorney, the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial

Department (hereinafter AGC) advises that it opposes Dib's application due to its improper form.

We agree with AGC that Dib inappropriately submitted an affirmation in support of his application to resign (see Matter of Lamson, 146 AD3d 1231, 1231-1232 [2017]; CPLR 2106 [a]; Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] [1]; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.22 [a]). Nonetheless, mindful that the application was submitted prior to the effective date of the Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters, and inasmuch as Dib's affirmation recited that the facts set forth therein were true and were made "under the penalties of perjury," we exercise our discretion to excuse the defect in Dib's application and address the merits thereof (see Matter of Lamson, 146 AD3d at 1232).

Significantly, AGC does not substantively oppose Dib's application. Accordingly, upon reading the notice of motion and affirmation of Dib dated June 16, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by AGC's Chief Attorney, and having determined that Dib is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib's application to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further

ORDERED that Albert Hamilton Dib shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.

Footnotes

Footnote 1: Dib's application was initially submitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, but was later resubmitted to this Court due to the fact that Dib has an out-of-state address on file with OCA and was admitted to practice by this Court (cf. Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.7 [a] [2]).



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.