Matter of Corrieri v Annucci

Annotate this Case
Matter of Corrieri v Annucci 2016 NY Slip Op 01734 Decided on March 10, 2016 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: March 10, 2016
521699

[*1]In the Matter of CARMINE CORRIERI, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: January 19, 2016
Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

Carmine Corrieri, Gowanda, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not

entitled to that relief (see Matter of Marcial v Fischer, 96 AD3d 1245, 1246 [2012]). He is, however, entitled to have restored the loss of good time incurred as a result of the disciplinary determination (see Matter of Moreno v Prack, 130 AD3d 1121, 1122 [2015]; Matter of Marcial v Fischer, 96 AD3d at 1246). Otherwise, as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of McCaskell v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 128 AD3d 1208, 1208-1209 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.