Matter of Walker v Annucci
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: April 21, 2016
521658
[*1]In the Matter of SHERMAN WALKER, Appellant,
v
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.
Calendar Date: February 23, 2016
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ.
Sherman Walker, Albion, appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frederick A. Brodie of counsel), for respondents.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliott III, J.), entered March 9, 2015 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a 2014 determination of the Board of Parole that denied his request for parole release. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in February 2016 and his request for parole release was again denied. Accordingly, the appeal from the dismissal of this proceeding is moot and, as the narrow exception to the mootness
doctrine is inapplicable, it must be dismissed (see Matter of Franko v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 126 AD3d 1193, 1193 [2015]; Matter of Mance v Evans, 119 AD3d 1316, 1316 [2014]).
Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.