Matter of Harris v Division of Parole

Annotate this Case
Matter of Harris v Division of Parole 2015 NY Slip Op 05543 Decided on June 25, 2015 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 25, 2015
519838

[*1]In the Matter of FREDDIE HARRIS, Appellant,

v

DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Calendar Date: May 5, 2015
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ.

Freddie Harris, Attica, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered July 22, 2014 in Franklin County, which, among other things, denied petitioner's application for an order to show cause to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Petitioner, an inmate, sought to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding to, among other things, challenge a determination revoking his parole. Supreme Court declined to issue the order to show cause, but granted petitioner leave to serve an amended petition. Petitioner filed an amended petition and Supreme Court denied his application for an order to show cause and dismissed the petition and amended petition. Petitioner now appeals.

Generally, no appeal lies from the denial of an ex parte application for an order to show cause (see Matter of Walker v Fischer, 104 AD3d 1001, 1002 [2013]; Matter of Tafari v Rock, 87

AD3d 792, 792 [2011], lv dismissed 17 NY3d 950 [2011]). Petitioner's attempt to appeal falls within this rule, and his appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Walker v Fischer, 104 AD3d at 1002).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.