Matter of Duncanson (Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Duncanson (Commissioner of Labor) 2014 NY Slip Op 01802 Decided on March 20, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: March 20, 2014
517020 In the Matter of the Claim of

[*1]PETER H. DUNCANSON, Appellant.

and

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Calendar Date: January 21, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy and Rose, JJ.


Peter H. Duncanson, New York City, appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York
City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 2013, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a teacher, was informed that he was required to obtain a Master's degree in education in order to be properly certified and maintain his employment. Despite three extensions, claimant failed to complete the degree at an accredited school before the expiration of the time allotted. The employer therefore terminated claimant's employment due to lack of a valid teaching certificate. Claimant's subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause and a recoverable overpayment of benefits was imposed. Claimant appeals.

The record establishes that claimant had sufficient time to obtain the Master's degree from an accredited school prior to the deadline set by the employer. Because claimant failed to take reasonable steps to protect his continued employment, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily separated from his employment without good cause (see Matter of Rhome [New York City Bd. of Educ.-Commissioner of Labor], 50 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2008]; Matter of Toussaint [Commissioner of Labor], 17 AD3d 761, 762 [2005]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.