People v Cioto

Annotate this Case
People v Cioto 2014 NY Slip Op 04811 Decided on June 26, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: June 26, 2014
105668

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

JOSEPH A. CIOTO, Appellant.

Calendar Date: May 2, 2014
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

John Ferrara, Monticello, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered December 20, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.

In satisfaction of a multi-count indictment and a superior court information, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced as a prior felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to, among other things, concurrent prison terms of 12 years and 1½ to 3 years, respectively, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request is granted (see People v Cruwys , 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes , 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment [*2]granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.