People v Turner

Annotate this Case
People v Turner 2014 NY Slip Op 06619 Decided on October 2, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 2, 2014
105542

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

KEVIN L. TURNER, Appellant.

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Rose, JJ.

Torrance L. Schmitz, Vestal, for appellant.

Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered March 22, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to both burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree as charged in separate superior court informations. In accord with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 4 years on his conviction of burglary in the third degree and 3½ years to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision on his conviction of burglary in the second degree. Defendant appeals, and appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD3d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment [*2]granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.