People v Clarke

Annotate this Case
People v Clarke 2014 NY Slip Op 07374 Decided on October 30, 2014 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: October 30, 2014
104194

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

NIGEL K. CLARKE, Also Known as BO, Appellant.

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

Jon Kosich, Greenville, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Paul Czajka, District Attorney, Hudson (James A. Carlucci of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Nichols, J.), rendered January 28, 2011, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in 2000 (5 AD3d 807 [2004], lvs denied 2 NY3d 796, 797 [2004]). He was sentenced to, among other things, a prison term of 15 years on the weapons possession conviction. The requisite term of postrelease supervision was not included as part of that sentence and, in 2011, defendant was returned before County Court for resentencing (see Correction Law § 601-d). County Court resentenced defendant on the weapons possession conviction to the original prison term, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals from the judgment resentencing him.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant, asserting that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel's brief, and the letter response of defendant himself, we agree. Thus, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.