Matter of Jones (Commissioner of Labor)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jones (Commissioner of Labor) 2013 NY Slip Op 06049 Decided on September 26, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: September 26, 2013
515916 In the Matter of the Claim of

[*1]WENDELL R. JONES, Appellant.

and

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Calendar Date: July 29, 2013
Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Spain and Garry, JJ.


Wendell R. Jones, Buffalo, appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York
City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 20, 2012, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment as a cleaner without good cause. Claimant met with his supervisors and discussed, among other things, the location of a coin he had found while cleaning a bank vault. Finding the manner of his supervisors to be accusatory and harassing, claimant became irate and quit the next day. The inability to get along with a supervisor who is perceived as unduly critical does not, however, constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of Nimons [Commissioner of Labor], 101 AD3d 1219, 1220 [2012]; Matter of Agranovich [Commissioner of Labor], 72 AD3d 1317, 1317 [2010]). In any case, claimant did not complain to the employer about the purportedly unprofessional conduct of his supervisors and "failed to take reasonable steps to protect [his] employment" (Matter of Nimons [Commissioner of Labor], 101 AD3d at 1220; see Matter of Roman [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2006]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.