Matter of Powell v Fischer

Annotate this Case
Matter of Powell v Fischer 2013 NY Slip Op 05359 Decided on July 18, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 18, 2013
515710

[*1]In the Matter of WARREN POWELL, Petitioner,

v

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: June 6, 2013
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.


Warren Powell, Comstock, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany
(Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon, smuggling and possession of contraband after a 2½-inch by one half-inch sharpened piece of metal secreted in the lining of his clothing set off a facility metal detector. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and that determination was upheld on his administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding solely challenging the determination of guilt as to the possession of a weapon charge.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's argument, the determination finding him guilty of possession of a weapon is supported by substantial evidence, including the misbehavior report and related documentation, photographs attached thereto, and petitioner's hearing testimony (see Matter of Harvey v Fischer, 94 AD3d 1303, 1303 [2012]).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unpersuasive. [*2]

Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.