Matter of Mays v Fischer

Annotate this Case
Matter of Mays v Fischer 2013 NY Slip Op 02794 Decided on April 25, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: April 25, 2013
514636

[*1]In the Matter of CLAUDE MAYS, Petitioner,

v

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Calendar Date: February 25, 2013
Before: Peters, P.J., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Claude Mays, Sonyea, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany
(Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, stalking and interference with an employee after he was observed leaning out of a line waiting to go through a metal detector in order to stare at a female correction officer. After petitioner was overheard making an inappropriate remark, the ensuing disturbance delayed the security processing of inmates in the line. Petitioner was found guilty of all but the stalking charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing. That determination was affirmed upon petitioner's administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Amaker v Bezio, 98 AD3d 1146, 1146 [2012]; Matter of Shields v Fischer, 95 AD3d 1574, 1574 [2012]). While petitioner denied committing the conduct alleged in the report, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Spikes v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1231, 1231 [2012], lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [Mar. 26, 2013]). [*2]

Peters, P.J., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.