Matter of Dye v Bernier

Annotate this Case
Matter of Dye v Bernier 2013 NY Slip Op 02128 Decided on March 28, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: March 28, 2013
514359

[*1]In the Matter of SHAWN M. DYE, Respondent,

v

AMANDA L. BERNIER, Now Known as AMANDA L. BERNIER-HUCKS, Appellant.

Calendar Date: February 13, 2013
Before: Mercure, J.P., Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.


Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant.
William L. Koslosky, Utica, attorney for the child.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Lambert, J.), entered February 2, 2012, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for custody of the parties' child.

In February 2012, Family Court granted petitioner's application for sole custody of the parties' child. Respondent appealed. Respondent subsequently filed a petition seeking custody. In November 2012, the court, upon the parties' consent, granted respondent sole custody. This subsequent order, which provides respondent with all the relief she seeks and supercedes the order being appealed, renders the appeal moot (see Matter of Rolston v Decker, 94 AD3d 1264, 1264 [2012]; Matter of Dickerson v Knox, 89 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2011]; Matter of Stalker v Stalker, 88 AD3d 1177, 1178 [2011]).

Mercure, J.P., Rose and Garry, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.