People v Vosburgh

Annotate this Case
People v Vosburgh 2013 NY Slip Op 05236 Decided on July 11, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 11, 2013
103097

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

GLENN VOSBURGH, Appellant.

Calendar Date: May 28, 2013
Before: Rose, J.P., Stein, Spain and Garry, JJ.


Andrew H. Wood, Albany, for appellant.
P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Steven M.
Sharp of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Rose, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered October 14, 2009, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of manslaughter in the first degree, waived his right to appeal and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 19 years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. This appeal ensued.

Defendant filed a notice of appeal that did not identify the judgment being appealed or the county in which it was rendered. While we have the discretion to treat a notice of appeal as valid despite an "inaccurate description of the judgment, sentence or order being or sought to be appealed" (CPL 460.10 [6]), the complete omission of any information regarding the judgment being appealed from cannot be characterized as an "inaccurate description" (see e.g. People v Therrien, 78 AD3d 1331, 1332 [2010]; People v Lerario, 50 AD3d 1396 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 961 [2008]; People v Bell, 299 AD2d 582, 583 n [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 55 [2002]; People v McNeil, 268 AD2d 611, 612 n [2000]). Accordingly, we find that the notice of appeal is invalid, thereby depriving this Court of jurisdiction. [*2]

Stein, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.