Matter of Walker v Fischer
Annotate this CaseDecided and Entered: November 15, 2012
514103
[*1]In the Matter of SHERMAN WALKER, Petitioner,
v
BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Calendar Date: September 26, 2012
Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.
Sherman Walker, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany
(Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating various disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and, therefore, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Scott v Prack, 97 AD3d 861 [2012]).
Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.