People v Wasley

Annotate this Case
People v Wasley 2012 NY Slip Op 07336 Decided on November 8, 2012 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: November 8, 2012
104404

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

RAYMOND R. WASLEY, Appellant.

Calendar Date: September 26, 2012
Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.


Abbie Goldbas, Utica, for appellant.
Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton
(Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 14, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced as a second felony offender to 10 years in prison, to be followed by 10 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant was sentenced accordingly and he now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. We find at least one issue of arguable merit pertaining to the severity of the sentence that warrants further review. Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Garren, 74 AD3d 1578 [2010]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. [*2]

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.