Essex Ins. Co. v Hunt

Annotate this Case
Essex Ins. Co. v Hunt 2009 NY Slip Op 05054 [63 AD3d 1404] June 18, 2009 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Essex Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Epsilon Zeta Alumni and others, Appellant, v Dane Hunt, Defendant, and John Newell et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Tell, Cheser & Breitbart, Garden City (Kenneth R. Feit of counsel), for appellant.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, P.L.L.C., Syracuse (Douglas P. Nedham of counsel), for John Newell, respondent.

Sugarman Law Firm, L.L.P., Syracuse (Stephen A. Davoli of counsel), for Artem Mischenko, respondent.

McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, L.L.P., Carle Place (Patrick Murphy of counsel), for Chase Dowdell, respondent.

Law Office of Mary Audi Bjork, Dewitt (Craig P. Niederpruem of counsel), for Dave Fellegara, respondent.

Law Offices of James Grosso, Pittsford (James C. Grosso of counsel), for Donald Reagan, respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered August 8, 2008 in St. Lawrence County, which, among other things, granted motions by defendants John Newell, [*2]Chase Dowdell, Dave Fellegara, Donald Reagan and Artem Mischenko for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

Order affirmed, upon the opinion of Justice David Demarest.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Kavanagh, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.