Matter of Williams v Walsh

Annotate this Case
Matter of Williams v Walsh 2008 NY Slip Op 08581 [56 AD3d 923] November 13, 2008 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009

In the Matter of Michael Williams, Petitioner, v James J. Walsh, as Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—[*1] Michael Williams, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Marion R. Buchbinder of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty following a tier II disciplinary hearing of disobeying a direct order, being out of place and making a false statement. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and corroborating hearing testimony (see Matter of Wigfall v Goord, 53 AD3d 943, 943 [2008]). To the extent preserved, we have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that the misbehavior report was facially defective, and we find no basis upon which to disturb respondent's determination. [*2]

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.