Matter of Colby v Colby

Annotate this Case
Matter of Colby 2008 NY Slip Op 05632 [52 AD3d 1113] June 19, 2008 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 13, 2008

In the Matter of Maxwell X. Colby, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

—[*1] Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Geoffrey E. Major of counsel), for petitioner.

Maxwell X. Colby, Oakhurst, N.J., respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984. He was previously admitted in New Jersey in 1975, where he maintains an office for the practice of law.

By order dated February 5, 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court reprimanded respondent for record-keeping deficiencies in his attorney trust account. The order further directed respondent to provide the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics with quarterly reconciliations of his attorney accounts certified by an accountant, for a period of one year.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent pursuant to this Court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has submitted an affirmation in response which does not establish any of the available defenses to reciprocal discipline (see 22 NYCRR 806.19 [d]), and we therefore grant petitioner's motion.

We further conclude that, consistent with the discipline imposed in New Jersey and in [*2]the interest of justice, respondent should be censured.

Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.